Knowledgeable he knew that it didn't show up in the older scanners - and he says that it was done deliberately it's not a problem with the scanners.
#Nikon scan 3.1 software upgrade#
"I asked Level 2 Nikon support about it this morning, to see if they were aware of the problem and hopefully working on a firmware upgrade to fix it. LS-8000 is perplexing because my belief was that this was a software bug.Īpparently Nikon is aware of this here is a message from a reader: That this is fixed in NikonScan 4 for the LS-9000 but not the LS-40 and LS-4000 but not on the previous generation of scanners, e.g. Respondents have told me problem also occurs on the
#Nikon scan 3.1 software full#
The negative scan mode does not use the full spectrum of tone values and requiresĬorrection of mid-tones. To 8-bits (unless, of course, the user has specified 16-bits). NikonScan’s negative mode takes longer because some of theįunctionality is not visible to the user: NikonScan performs the scan inġ6-bits, applies a built in gamma setting and user curves, and then down-samples Required 45" when connected to a 3 GHz PC but required 102" when connected to
For example, a slide scanned using the FH-835M Performance has such a significant effect on scan time. These timings should only be interpreted as indications because processor Resolution, no analog gain setting, using a 3 GHz PC. The scans were full-frame, 1x sampling, 8-bits output, 4k May notice the scanner making additional passes to achieve this, but this is time well-spent.Ĭarriage traversal distance, i.e. Seems to have been improved, resulting in better exposure settings.
0 kommentar(er)
